Our Speech at the Honors College: What did it REALLY Say?

Dear reader, there has been misinformation and outright slander about what I actually said at the Honors College event earlier this week. In order to allay people’s concerns that unkind things were said, I’m publishing the full recording here. It’s a bit long, about 23.5 minutes mostly just of me speaking, plus a couple minutes of dialogue with students before one angry communist prevented students from asking further questions.  He was since charged by Auburn City Police for this disruption.

For those who don’t have time to listen to the whole recording, here are some of the main points (along with timestamps to confirm that is indeed what I said).


Main points of the Honors College speech:

  • There is a terrible epidemic of rape in prisons, and most of it is explicitly racial, Black prisoners the most common aggressors and White prisoners the most common victims. I made it clear that I do not infer that all or even a lot Black people, or even all/a lot of Black people in prison, want to rape White people. I also made it clear that I do not intend to guilt-trip all Black people for the sins of a few, even though the left likes to do this to Whites. (Part 1/2: 3:48-4:10)
  • Prisoners join racial gangs (like Aryan Brotherhood for Whites, Mexican Mafia for Hispanics, Black Guerrilla Family for Blacks, etc.) due to the racial tensions in prison from forcing people together who want to be separate. This is a metaphor for the US government’s policies as a whole, which are forcing White people who would [sub]consciously prefer separate neighborhoods into diverse situations or into White Flight, which is destroying White social bonds.
  • The solution: let White Conservatives have a NO-FAULT DIVORCE from people we are too different from! (Part 2/2: 5:15-6:30)

This does NOT separate Whites who want multiculturalism from other groups! It allows but does not force other groups to do separatism if they want. It will reduce ethnic conflicts and let political minorities (e.g. US communists) have their own system of government, instead of forcing them to be governed by an alt-Right government!

In a NO-FAULT divorce, we do NOT blame the other party (parties in this case; it’s a “polyamorous marriage”, Lol). But everyone has the right to divorce if a marriage isn’t going well, and sometimes people can become friends after divorce, when they were angry at each other when they were forced to be around each other! But anyone who tries to force someone to stay in a marriage they want to leave is an abuser and creep.


For those who have the time to listen to the whole speech (total about 26 minutes with questions)

Part 1/2 link: The first sentence was cut off: “Wyatt Mann is the president of the Auburn White Student Union, an organization that creates a community for White Separatists at Auburn but does not believe that any race can be said to be superior to any other,…”

Part 2/2 link


Detailed breakdown of the subtler points of the speech:

  • The hosting professor introduces our group and the subject of our talk. It needs to be focused on skinheads but also explain how the WSU is opposed to skinhead violence and hatred. His first few sentences got a bit cut off, so I’ve transcribed them in their entirety here:

    “Wyatt Mann is the president of the Auburn White Student Union, an organization that creates a community for White Separatists at Auburn but does not believe that any race can be said to be superior to any other, let alone support any form of aggressive violence. In fact, he thinks that his solution of allowing free association, separatism, and secession for any groups that want it will actually defuse the racial and political tensions that are spreading in the US. He will argue that the skinheads you will see in this movie are not representative of the modern alt-Right and that they are instead the product of brutal prison warfare resulting from different races being forced together with no escape”

  • I thanked the Honors College for generously inviting me to speak and stated that the Honors College and the professor hosting the event in no way endorse my views, just believe in free speech and the benefits of dialogue. (up to 1:20).
  • I introduced the huge problem of prison rape in America. Quick: who is raped more, all men (in and out of prison), or all women in the USA? (Men are: an estimated 140k rapes in prison alone, though as we’ll see prisons never prosecute prisoners for raping, so the numbers are uncertain. Compare to 90k rapes of women reported to police.)
  • Often, these rapes have a strong racial dimension. One prisoner’s story:

“I’ve been sentenced for a D.U.I. offense. My 3rd one. I’m a tall white male, who unfortunately has a small amount of feminine characteristics. And very shy. These characteristics have got me raped so many times I have no more feelings physically. I have been raped by up to 5 black men at a time . . . I probably have AIDS now. I have great difficulty raising food to my mouth from shaking after nightmares or thinking so hard on all this . . . I’ve laid down without a physical fight to be sodomized. To prevent so much damage in struggles, ripping and tearing. Though in not fighting, it caused my heart and spirit to be raped as well. Something I don’t know if I’ll ever forgive myself for.” (3:03-3:48)

  • I made it clear that I do *not* infer that *all* Black people, or even all Black people in prison, want to rape White people. I also made it clear that I do *not* intend to guilt-trip *all* Black people for the sins of a few, even though the left likes to do this to Whites. (3:48-4:10)
  • I also brought in systematic research, *from left-leaning groups*, into the question of rape in prison and its racial dimension. After all, it’s terrible science to rely on anecdotes-the anecdote is only to viscerally illustrate the terror that survivors of racial attacks can feel. (**4:10-5:43**) Nerdy research dump warning:

First, Just Detention cites Knowles, who reviews the literature from a variety of scholars, including government experts:

“The fact remains that blacks continually and almost exclusively rape whites in prison. The evidence is based on studies conducted over the last 40 years (Davis 1968; Nacci 1978; Lookwood 1980; Starchild 1990). Why does this white victim preference prevail? Whites continue to be raped more severely and frequently and at a disproportionate rate than any other racial or ethnic group (in Gones 1967; Bowker 1980; Lookwood 9180). This racial inequality may be the largest in any violent crime committed in the United States. Rape in prison is rarely a sexual act, but one of violence, politics, and acting out power roles (Rideau and Wikberg 1992, p. 75). The act of rape in the ultra masculine world in prison constitutes the ultimate humiliation visited upon a male by forcing him to assume the role of a woman.

In American prisons, studies by sociologists suggest that more than 90% of rapes are inter-racial and may be motivated more by a need for sexual dominance over another race than by sexual passions (Starchild 1990, p. 145). Many rapes are by blacks on whites, suggesting that it is gives the lower–class black, who has felt trod upon all his life, his one chance to dominate a white person (Starchild 1990, p. 145). Consequently, the victims are almost always young white prisoners. Scacco (1982, p. 91) has also noted a disproportionate number of black aggressors and white victims in studies of sexual assaults in jails and prisons. Even if the minority of prisoners are black, the minority of victims are white (Sacco 1982, p. 91). When Lookwood (1980, p. 28) asked ‘targets’ to identify their aggressors at the time of their rape, most were black (80%), some were Hispanic (14%), and a few were white (6%).”

Once again, it is clear here that population rates do not account for the disparity. “Although many causation factors have been suggested for prison rape, they are all overshadowed by the racial categories of the victims and the rapists. Prison rape has been shown throughout this study to be racially motivated by predominantly black inmates specifically against white inmates who in turn are the victims. Although more studies need to be conducted to confirm this theory, racial hatred of whites by blacks appears to be the main force driving prison rape. In fact, the US Department of Justice (1991, p. 15) noted that black (57%) and Hispanic (51%) violent inmates were at least four times more likely than white (11%) violent inmates to have victimized someone of a different race or ethnic group.”

Likewise, Human Rights Watch published a book titled No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons by Joanne Mariner in 2001 (available for free here), which surveys research indicating there are about 140,000 rapes in US prisons annually (hard to tell since not a single prisoner has ever been charged with raping another in prison). Some important points from the report:

Past studies have documented the prevalence of black on white sexual aggression in prison.(213) These findings are further confirmed by Human Rights Watch’s own research. Overall, our correspondence and interviews with white, black, and Hispanic inmates convince us that white inmates are disproportionately targeted for abuse.(214) Although many whites reported being raped by white inmates, black on white abuse appears to be more common.

African Americans typically face sexual abuse at the hands of other African Americans, and Hispanics at the hands of other Hispanics. … “only a black can turn out [rape] a black, and only a chicano can turn out a chicano.”(215) Breaking this rule by sexually abusing someone of another race or ethnicity, **with the exception of a white inmate**[emphasis mine], could lead to racial or ethnic unrest, as other members of the victim’s group would retaliate against the perpetrator’s group.

  • Introducing the subject of prison gangs: they are basically all racially-based. E.g. there are many Hispanic prison gangs like MS13 and The Mexican Mafia. Interestingly, they not only protect their own, but also police their own members to prevent warfare from erupting between their race and another. (6:00-7:15)
  • I don’t think I emphasized this enough in my speech, but prison and its environment of racial warfare and rape is the origin of prison gangs.  This is why I talked about prison rape.  Again, the point was not to guilt-trip Black people the way the Left guilts Whites. This includes most White racist skinhead gangs, Aryan Brotherhood, etc., in addition to Black and Hispanic gangs. Later on in my speech, I state that I obviously do *not* support the actions of these gangs, but that they result from governments forcing different races together when they cannot get along on an individual level. Anyone who in any way claims I *like* White prison gangs is lying or freaked out by my use of statistics and didn’t really listen to what I was saying; I’m actually offering a credible solution to eliminate prison gangs. (e.g. I make my opposition to them clear at 7:13-7:30)
  • The establishment doesn’t care about prison rape, guards don’t feel any responsibility to stop it, and not a single prisoner has ever been charged in America with raping another.
  • Why do most prisons have racial warfare? Groups being forced together against their own will, even though it makes things way more dangerous. HRW states:

    “Certain prison systems seem to have almost no positive social interaction — not even the most trivial — between members of different races.”

    Yet judges often force a White person to have a non-White cellmate, even if he wants a White cellmate. (9:30-10:30) How is that fair?

  • Prison as a metaphor for other instances of FORCED integration in America: school bussing (White kids forced to ride the bus sometimes 2 hours away to a different city in order to attend a school with few White kids, in the hopes that they would become “less racist” or that it would help Black students. I discuss horror stories visited upon White family members: **10:40-13:20)

Let me be clear: while I oppose White kids being forced into diversity, I also oppose Black and White people who want to be together being forced apart by the government. Both are equally bad violations of individuals’ rights to free association and free choice. Therefore, I do not support Jim Crow or other types of segregation that force people who want to be around each other to be apart!

  • Another important example of forced diversity that hurts White people (though we can actually escape it, unlike prison or forced school bussing): the decline of strong, safe, White communities (**13:30-14:20**) due to the forced ethnic replacement of White neighborhoods, via Section 8 (which can actually hurt Black communities too by paying Black people to uproot themselves).

END PART 1. Switch to Part 2

  • For the record, I don’t mind giving Black people government welfare for housing, including giving them money to live in a community where everyone wants integration. What I mind is social engineering that White people don’t want (Part 2 **0:00-0:20**)
  • Nobel-laureate Schelling’s theoretical model of a racial “tipping point” in a neighborhood, and its empirical validation, that a 14.5% Black neighborhood is at the “tipping point” for the average White American and will quickly lose most of its White residents (**0:20-1:40**)

More nerdy social science stuff:

Schelling produced a theoretical model of racial separation showing that integrated neighborhoods are inherently unstable if people (e.g. Whites) have even a small preference for their own. This Stanford page has an interactive model. His research has since been empirically validated, and the threshold of racial diversity that the average American will tolerate before moving was quantified at about 14.5% from 1990-2000 (ie. if there were more than 14.5% non-White people in a neighborhood, Whites would quickly start to leave and it would become almost entirely non-White quite rapidly). As there become fewer and fewer White communities, the amount of diversity they will have to tolerate will probably go up, but keep in mind that it’s just being tolerated by this proportion of White people, and that most are not seeking it out.

Again, those who do seek out diversity should NOT be stopped from finding it: my policy proposals would not prevent them in any way.

  • Robert Putnam’s story (**2:05-3:50**)

From Higher Ed Chronicle: “Putnam finds that in more diverse neighborhoods, people trust one another less, are less altruistic, and have fewer friends. They keep to themselves, “hunker down,” in his words. Not only do people in diverse neighborhoods trust those who are ethnically different less; they also tend to be less trusting of people who are similar to them. They don’t spend as much time volunteering in their communities, and instead “huddle unhappily in front of the television.””

Of note, Putnam does claim that “diversity ‘will’ work” in the long term and that it still has some “benefits”, but does not supply proof of these benefits. These imagined benefits are not concrete improvements in people’s quality of life, but rather opinion-based, philosophical, and normative claims that cannot be proven.

+ I make it clear, again, that just because I think htat diversity has harmful effects for White people does *not* mean I think I have the right to tell liberal people who [say they] want diversity that they can’t have it ‘for their own good’. I merely want free association rights for those people who realize that they don’t want forced diversity.

Also, this research suggests that diversity is harmful to other races, as well, so they might benefit from their own separatism, *but I know it’s not my place to tell other races what to do*.

+ Life is getting worse in every way in America except for technology (which is exponential, building off previous advances, and thus would only decline in a truly catastrophic situation). We have *depression, drug problems, anxiety, dropping out, doing solitary things like TV/Facebook/Netflix, etc.; distrust of our neighbors, government, and media; etc.* at all-time highs. Our society is sick!

*****

  • The solution: let White Conservatives have a NO-FAULT DIVORCE! (**5:15-6:30**)

This does NOT separate Whites who want multiculturalism from other groups! It *allows but does not force* other groups to do separatism if they want. It will reduce ethnic conflicts and let political minorities (e.g. US communists) have their own system of government, instead of forcing them to be governed by an alt-Right government!

In a NO-FAULT divorce, we do NOT blame the other party (parties in this case, it’s a “polyamorous marriage”, Lol). But everyone has the right to divorce if a marriage isn’t going well, and sometimes people can become friends after divorce, when they were angry at each other when they were forced to be around each other!

+ There are advantages to non-Alt-Right people if alt-Righters are allowed self-determination/independence. (**6:55-8:00**)

if people were born literally sightless from birth, would people still organize around race?

My answer: *nerdy science alert*: First, I pointed out that race is far more than merely skin color. Interestingly, there are some genes that control neurons and the brain that have seen much *more* evolutionary selection than have the genes responsible for skin coloration differences Wu, Zhang, 2011 (Keep in mind that IQ is a highly polygenic trait, much more so than skin color). Races are effectively extended families on a grand scale, and many have been separated from each other for tens of thousands of years; plus, the pressures of civilization and artificial selection have probably magnified the rate of human evolution one-hundred-fold in the past 10,000 years alone as per Cochran, Harpending, 2009.

Next, the person who asked the question asked what would happen if all people were literally born blind from birth. I pointed out that that is a counterfactual that would no doubt utterly change the nature of human evolution, and it’s hard to imagine what would happen in such a divergent hypothetical.

Finally, I noted that it’s a common misconception that children are color-blind and have to be indoctrinated into racism. For instance, at just 9 months of age, babies already show a clear preference for learning from someone of the same race than from a different race according to research from the University of Massachussets at Amherst that was published in the journal *Development Science* in 2012

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *