Patriots in Auburn also took part in this activism! We launched a campaign to raise awareness of the threat of Sharia law with these posters (here’s a readable PDF that you can read, print off, and share with others!)

So far, the response has been overwhelmingly positive: over a dozen people have sent us contacts either encouraging us or inquiring about membership (not bad for summer semester!).  It’s no surprise that patriotic Auburn students and citizens are deeply concerned about radical Islam enforcing its crazy religious laws in the US.  Thanks for standing with us against Sharia, Auburn, and W.A.R. E.A.G.L.E.!!

Fun fact: the design of the “Sharia-Free Zone” poster is actually a spoof off of posters that Islamic radicals plastered over a “no-go” zone in London (a very dangerous ghetto controlled by Islamic radicals that police and emergency services often fear to enter).  They were proclaiming Islamic law in this English neighborhood and subtly threatening women who did not dress “modestly”.

Remember: as barbaric and disgusting as the retrograde religion of Islam is, the real danger is from the traitorous politicians that are bringing in potentially-dangerous immigrants, against the will of the people.

That said, our treasonous political establishment is partly responsible for the war and destruction in the Middle East that has created these radicals.  E.g. the failed War in Iraq (that neoconservative Jews in America pushed to defeat the secular, anti-Islamist dictator Saddam Hussein just because he was a threat to Israel) paved the way for ISIS.

That’s why we and millions of other patriots were overjoyed when Donald Trump declared his opposition to the neocons’ Wars for Israel.  Of course, the “Republican” and Democratic establishments were outraged!

Additionally, we are happy to ally with secular, nationalist Arabs who want to throw off the shackles of demonic Islam.  In particular, we support non-religious Palestinian liberation organizations against Israel’s brutal and genocidal occupation of Palestine (the cunning Israelis actually supported religious nutcases in Hamas to take away support from the non-religious Palestine Liberation Organization! Then, they use their demonic religious puppets to wreak barbarism as only Islam can, ruining the countries that would otherwise fight against the Israeli War Machine).

Needless to say, if Israelis will heartlessly genocide Arab Gentiles, they’d happily do the same to other innocent Gentiles, including White, Black, and Asian.  But the alt-Right is quickly rising in power and will soon be able to oppose their supremacy and promote peaceful coexistence for all peoples (instead of forced diversity that always ends in conflict and unnecessary hatred between different groups that can’t get along)

The post Auburn Contributes to the #MarchAgainstSharia! appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

The offense this time is  creating some unbelievably inaccurate content about Kek, Kekistan, and the Cult of Kek.

The Kekistani Flag

First off, the SPLC gets the Kekistani flag completely and categorically wrong. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Here is the offending text:

The [Kekistani] banner’s design, in fact, perfectly mimics a German Nazi war flag, with the Kek logo replacing the swastika and the green replacing the infamous German red. [Kekistanis] are particularly fond of the way the banner trolls liberals who recognize its origins.

So it appears that this text makes the following assertions:

1. The Kekistani flag is based off the German Nazi war flag.
2. Individuals with the Kekistani flag troll liberals who know of its origins.

Each of these assertions is categorically false, as I will demonstrate below.

Kekistani Flag Origins

The SPLC incorrectly cites the German Nazi war flag as the inspiration of the Kekistani flag. Students of Vexillology will note that this is not the case.  In fact, the Kekistani flag is merely a modification of the War Ensign of Imperial German Navy, which existed almost 20 years before the NSDAP was formed.

How could a flag possibly trace its roots to something that didn’t exist until 20 years after it was created? Did Nazi Germany have a time machine? That sounds like some fan fiction right there.

Kekistanis and Trolling

Again, the SPLC is wrong with their claims that the followers of Kek troll liberals how know of its origins.

How could this ever be possible if the Kekistani flag does not trace its roots back to German Nazi war flag?

Violence and Kekistanis

Another incredibly incorrect implication is that Kekistani protesters have plotted to create violent scenes with Antifa (whom we know to be violent thugs).

This accusation is simply ludicrous and is a clear-cut case of victim-blaming. You would never say that a mugging victim “plotted to create violent scenes” with a thief. So why does the SPLC think it’s ok for radical militant Antifascists to go out and attack innocent Kekistanis if they “planned” for violence?

In recent weeks, [Kekistani demonstrators] at public events planned to create violent scenes with leftist antifacist [sic] counterprotesters have appeared carrying Kekistan banners.

Moreover, adherents of Kek are peaceful and gentle. It clearly says so in the Kek Manifesto. SPLC: If #NotAllMuslims are violent terrorists, then #NotAllPol are violent Nazis. You must recognize our religion and respect it. To do anything else is a double standard, you bigots.

And SPLC: Learn how to spell fascist correctly. Why should people trust you when you can’t even run a spell-check on your oh-so-important articles?

Kek is not a Joke

The SPLC says that the Cult of Kek is merely satirical and is a joke. This is not the case, but the SPLC thinks it is:

One of the leaders of the group offered a satirical speech: “The Kekistani people are here, they stand with the oppressed minorities, the oppressed people of Kekistan. They will be heard, they will be set free. Reparations for Kekistan now! Reparations for Kekistan right now!”

[2 paragraphs omitted]

The main point of the whole exercise is to mock “political correctness,” [a Kekistani] shibboleth, and deeply reflective of the ironic, often deadpan style of online trolling in general, and [Kekistani] “troll storms” especially. Certainly, if any “normies” [meaning non-adherents] were to make the mistake of taking their “religion” seriously and suggesting that their “deity” was something they actually worshipped, they would receive the usual mocking treatment reserved for anyone foolish enough to take their words at face value.

This is an incredibly distasteful act! You have insulted both our people and our god (praise him!) at the same time! You would never do this to any other religion, so this is textbook bigotry.

Does anyone deny that Buddists, Christians, Taoists, or Animists have sincere faiths? Never! But somehow the SPLC thinks that it is okay to completely dismiss our religion!

News flash: just because Kekistanis are a minority in America does not mean you can stomp all over our rights and identity. We are a people and we have rights.

Stop blaspheming our god SPLC. You are a lot of religious bigots.

And Praise Kek!

The post Kek and the SPLC’s Lies appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

However, this post is not about finals: it is about criticism from the Auburn University chapter of the SPLC on Campus (AUSPLC) and their incorrect remarks concerning the Auburn White Student Union (AWSU). Specifically, we will be addressing their comments concerning our website and the activism of individuals on campus.

In this post, we will explain why  AWSU is not ignorant and why AUSPLC is ignorant and anti-White.

On “Ignorance”

First, we would like to respond to the claim that AWSU is “spreading ignorance on campus.” This is simply untrue. In fact, we are doing quite the opposite with our general information campaign. This campaign’s primary purpose and goal is to educate students about the issues White people face today.

Consider this Tweet:

AU family doesn't look like much of a family with "White Student Union" spreading ignorance on campus. We're better than this @AuburnU pic.twitter.com/9XkXvCYOUW

— AU SPLC (@au_splc) April 27, 2017

Archive: https://archive.fo/NqkQn (in case the Tweet is deleted).

The notion that we are spreading ignorance is flat-out wrong. In this case, you are the only one spreading ignorance. We expected better from an organization that claims to “facilitate communication between diverse groups.”

Newsflash, AUSPLC: those “diverse groups” include White people.

Let’s break apart this tweet image by image.

Are you affiliated with Auburn University?

The first image in AUSPLC’s tweet is a screenshot of our FAQ. There is nothing ignorant about it at all. We are simply clarifying our (unofficial) status with Auburn University.

Are you just run-of-the-mill Republicans?

The second image in the tweet is a clarification of the AWSU’s political stances. In the paragraph we claim the following:

While many conservatives gave lip-service to their constituency, they stabbed our country in the back with anti-White schemes such as pointless wars, mass immigration, and affirmative action.

If AUSPLC included this image in their Tweet, we can only assume that they disagree with this message. Fair enough, but what do you actually disagree with AUSPLC? Do you disagree with our message, or are you having an irrational knee-jerk reaction?

If you actually read the section, we claim the following:

1. In the past, so-called “conservative” politicians gave lip-service to their (White) voters, and did not represent their interests.
2. The same politicians brought our country into pointless wars (e.g. Iraq and Afghanistan).
3. The same politicians allowed the institution of mass (non-White) immigration into the United States (the Hart-Cellar Act, which received 24 Republican votes in the Senate and 117 in the House).
4. The same politicians allowed affirmative action to take shape (numerous laws and executive orders over the years).
5. The aforementioned policies are not in the interest of White Americans.

So AUSPLC, which of these claims is wrong? Save us the trouble, because we know that you can’t answer. Each of the claims is true, and we will explain why in the following sections.

Claim 1

Did these (or any) politicians actually act in the interest of their constituents?

No. It’s common knowledge on both sides of the aisle that politicians commonly stab their voters in the back. It’s practically a nationwide meme that American politicians betray their voters whenever they arrive in Washington.

Claim 2

Did “conservatives” keep us out of Iraq and Afghanistan?

No. A total of 9 Republicans did not vote in favor of the Iraq Resolution.

Were these wars pointless?

Yes, because there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq. Moreover, Operation Desert Storm was not justified either.

Claim 3

Did “conservative” politicians institute mass non-White immigration?

Yes, and this is objectively true. The “conservative” Republicans of the House and the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of the Hart-Cellar Act.

The Hart-Cellar Act allowed millions of non-White peoples to immigrate to America. Because of this, White Americans may become a minority in our own country.

Claim 4

Is affirmative action in the interests of White Americans?

Obviously not. How could taking away scholarships, jobs, and bids from Whites and giving them to others on the sole factor of race possibly be in the best interest of White Americans?

Claim 5

None of the above policies are in the interests of White Americans. In case you forgot, let’s review:

Are pointless wars and losing American lives in the interests of Whites? No. Losing American soldiers lives’ is not in the interests of any Americans (both White and non-White).

Is it in the interest of White Americans to become an eventual minority in their own country? No. Face it: being in the minority sucks, regardless of race. It sucks for both Whites and non-Whites. Why would White Americans ever want to be a minority? It simply isn’t in our interest.

Is affirmative action in the interest of White American voters? No. It is not in the interest of White Americans to take resources (taxes, jobs, etc) from themselves and give those resources to other races via affirmative action.

Do you hate Blacks/Jews/Mexicans/Asians/Other Races?

The third image AUSPLC posted is also from our FAQ.

We give AUSPLC some credence here, because they may have misinterpreted our text.

For some, the text may imply that we (AWSU) love our race as much as Blacks love our (White) race.  We totally understand if the misleading wording was your issue, AUSPLC. In fact, we have updated the wording of the page in question. Now, let’s discuss other possible issues with AWSU’s response.

If AUSPLC doesn’t have issues with the wording, but rather the general message, then why? What’s the issue with being pro-White? If being pro-Black isn’t anti-White [these are the AUSPLC’s own words (archive)], then does pro-White mean anti-Black or anti-non-White?

Reminder: AWSU is pro-White — not anti-Black or anti-non-White.

Right now, there are 18 dedicated non-White student organizations at Auburn University. What is the AUSPLC’s issue with a single pro-White organization at Auburn? Promoting pro-Black, pro-Indian, or pro-Korean organizations while denigrating pro-White organizations is a double standard and textbook example of discrimination.  And isn’t the definition of racism discrimination based solely on race?

How can you be against our organization unless you are anti-White, AUSPLC? We promote neither hate nor ignorance, but somehow you still manage to criticize us.

Ironically, it seems that in your anti-racist crusade, the AUSPLC has become what it hates — racist.

Welcome

The final image AUSPLC posted is of our homepage.

We can’t fathom any issues the AUSPLC has with this page.

Are you in favor of anti-White ideas? Are you in favor of Marxism? Please AUSPLC, let us know what you could possibly disagree with on that page.

Our (and Others’) Activism

The AUSPLC also discussed their issues with many of the flyers on campus, so let’s address that.

While we do post many flyers on campus, we certainly don’t post all of them. Many of the flyers on campus are not ours. In fact, the last four flyers posted on the AUSPLC Twitter account were  not created by AWSU or its affiliates (one (archive), two (archive), three (archive), and four (archive)).

Maybe AUSPLC cares about vandalism rather than the messages of the flyers.

Does AUSPLC condemn Antifa’s vandalism? Why hasn’t the organization issued a statement condemning the vandalism of various leftist elements on campus?

Or is the AUSPLC simply complaining about vandalism when it suits its own interests?

When AWSU does hang up flyers, it’s only in legal, non-destructive fashions (unlike leftists, as shown above). We don’t vandalize property – that is beneath us.

We had nothing to do with Goy Hall (although it was hilarious). We also had nothing to do with the Anticom posters. In fact, AWSU has no affiliation with Anticom whatsoever. Our only similarities are that we both are opposed to Communism and Marxism.

So AUSPLC, do you disagree with the medium? Do you disagree with our message? Do you disagree with our factoids? Or are you simply having a knee-jerk reaction? Please help us, we can’t seem to figure this out.

Conclusion

Do your homework, and stop misleading people, AUSPLC. We will not tolerate your anti-White message any longer. Don’t claim that you represent diverse groups whenever you condemn White people for taking their own side.

We will fight for our ideas and our people. You will not silence us.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

The post Response to Auburn University SPLC appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

Want to learn about membership? Have a look at our page detailing membership.

The post Now Recruiting! appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

Amazing victory tonight! Thanks to everyone who was involved!#Auburn

— Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) April 19, 2017

UPDATED: University must allow Spencer to speak in Foy Hall, judge rules. Administrators plan to comply https://t.co/8cEOBCIJFT #alpolitics

— The Auburn Plainsman (@TheAUPlainsman) April 18, 2017

This is a yuge victory for us, because it shows that our violent (and nasty!) opponents cannot silence us with a Heckler’s veto. What an amazing victory for the movement and our people!

This is a big time win for us, and it’s just the beginning. Going forward, we have big things planned for both Auburn and our country.

And this is just the beginning. You ain’t seen nothing yet.

PS: Our president had a quick rendezvous with Richard before his talk. Richard said that he thought AWSU was fake. We assure you, Richard — we are real, and we are here to stay!

You can view Richard Spencer’s full speech and Q&A below (courtesy of The Plainsman)

The post Spencer Speaks! appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

Today, you may have seen some flyers on campus. This is part of a education campaign known as Day of the Flyer (DotF). DotF is an international signal-boosting campaign that took place on the night April 23, 2017. For the event, DotF participants posted pro-White flyers to educate the general populace about our problems and ideas.

This campaign is necessary because of the prevalence of anti-White professors at universities such as Eric Clanton and George Ciccariello-Maher. It is our hope that we have spread awareness of the issues the White race faces today.

We were very surprised to see the turnout last night. Surprisingly, we saw many flyers on campus that weren’t even ours! Way to go, tigers!

We have posted some flyers we saw around Auburn’s main campus below.

Edit (4/25/2017): The day after we published this post someone modified the sign for Foy Hall. We have added this photo to the gallery.

Did you see a flyer on campus that wasn’t in this post? Please post it in the comments below! Want to join us? Fill out an application and we’ll reach out to you!

The post April 23rd: The Day of the Flyer appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.

This pamphlet goes into greater detail about the nature of the Noahide laws, the anti-Gentile racism of the Lubavitch sect (as well as a few other leading Jewish rabbis in Israel), and its infection of our political class at the highest levels.

Read more on Scribd:

https://www.scribd.com/document/344396741/lubavitch-pamphlet-online-format#from_embed

The post Exposing the Noahide Laws appeared first on Auburn White Student Union.